Handout for the spokes council
PROPOSALS TO THE PGA PROCESS DISCUSSIONS
You'll find a lot of information about the PGA process structures in the “Plaisantation”, available at the infopoint. The way these discussions will be organized, their contents as well as some central questions are described in the last part of the practical guide. Here is a list of the proposals to the spokescouncil.
Sommaire
- Handout for the spokes council
'''(0) INTRODUCTION: NOTATION USED ETC.'''
(I)nformation that will mainly be anounced and do not seem to need any further debate.
(P)eople are needed for this proposal
(D)ecission -Points marked with D should be debated and decided upon.
(A) TOOLS FOR NETWORKING: IMPROVING THEM, GETTING INVOLVED, CREATING NETWORK STUCTURES
1) About PGA
- infopoints, general things:
(I) we decided to make available the various infopoint documents and infopoint kit on a specific infopoint page on the pgaconference.org website, with a link on the agp.org website
(I) the infopoint webpage would also contain an updated and more detailed list of infopoints, as well as survey
(I)(P) the infopoints Kit on the webpage should contain:
- a document & survey about how to become an infopoint - english, translation needed - plaisantation, a document about pga history and structures, in french and english - translation needed in spanish, german, russian... - pga reader from the france 2006 conference in french, english and spanish - translation needed in other languages - a booklet of presentation about the pga global process in french - translation needed in english, spanish, german, russian. - a compilation of recent texts about the pga process in english - translation needed - the practical guide of the france 2006 conference in french and english - the final newspaper of accounts about the france 2006 conference in french and english - need translation - the plaisantation should be updated after this conference - all the new usefull pga related texts for infopoints and translation of existing texts should be sent to pga-infopoints(at)pgaconference.org - All documents should be available both in text and pdf - most of these docs are already available on http://pgaconference.org/en/2006/materials - the various pictures used for pga infopoints documents should be able on the infopoint webpage as well
- communication between infopoint and tools of coordination
(I) we thought that the pga_europe_process(at)squat.net and pga_europe_resistance(at)squat.net lists should remain the main communication tools for infopoints and other people involved with the pga network.
(I) pga-discussion(at)squat.net list will be destroyed, some lists will be renamed from "stamp-" to "pga-", and descriptions of the email lists will be added on the website.
(I) pga_europe_process(at)squat.net for discussions on the PGA Europe process. pga-resistance(at)squat.net for announcements about actions. pga-announce(at)pgaconference.org to be invited to next conference and other bigger events. globalaction(at)lists.riseup.net for global process.
(I) we decided that we would make a paperlist passed around at meetings during this conference to ask people if they want to subscribe on the pga_(process|resistance) lists.
(I) we'll create an email adress for infopoints: pga-infopoints(at)pgaconference.org. This email address will be administrated by a group of people. It will be used for various infopoint administrative tasks, for new infopoints who want to be listed, for old infopoints who want to update their survey, and to send the various documents and translations that should be added to the infopoint webpage. The admins inform the process list and will attempt to contact infopoints to get a better understanding of the group. There is a 3 week reaction period. Afterwards the new infopoint will be added to the homepage. So far mawty(at)riseup.net, nicolu(at)poivron.org, teresateran(at)hotmail.com, skrati(at)yahoo.com and schwarzmarkt-pga(at)riseup.net have voluteered to take on that task.
- Translations
(I)(P) A working group (re)organising the translation infrastructure has been formed. Translations site might be merged with indymedia translations (http://translations.indymedia.org/). The PGA conference 06 translations list will be used until another solution has been found. Admins are needed. Necessary translation work for PGA can be announced here.
(P) We recommend the usage of 3 working languages posts to the process list: spanish, french, english. It would be nice to have at least translations of short summaries.
(I) There is the idea of infopoints translating the newsletter or the infopoint materials into their local languages.
- Infopoints classified list and how to register as infopoint
(I) there was a general agreement on the fact that we shouldn't take decisions about pga structures and projects anymore when there are no people clearly responsible to work on the task and make the decision happen.
(I) we decided to create a survey on the website for collectives who want to be added on the list of infopoints. These infopoints list will be also classified relating to their various activites, structures and issues in order to have both a general list and some classified lists (eg: to make it easier for people who want to know the infopoinst that are working on gender issues or collective cooking structure or autonomous server...)
(I) This survey will be available on the website. It will also be passed around during the centralised meeting, you can fill it in and give it back to the infopoint of dijon's conference or send it back to pga-infopoints(at)pgaconference.org. Infopoint adress administrators will also check if the old infpoints still want to be on the list and if they can fill the new survey.
2) Contents
(P) Reports: working about the outcomes of the conference, rep newspaper and information spreading. Movie projects about this conference...
(I) PGA newsletter: it was discussed many times to recreate a PGA newsletter that could give informations about pga related groups and actions, be printed and given to people by groups involved and especially the infopoints. We discussed that again. People said it was politically really tricky to have a group of people deciding on the contents of a "pga" newsletter and about which struggles would get or not visibility through this information tool. Two possibilities came up as a result:
- no pga newsletter;
- a newsletter done each time by a different infopoint;
We propose to try again to have an « inspired by pga » newsletter that could be distributed over europe and be available as a part of the infopoint kit on the webpage.
- the idea is to have it done each time by a new pga infopoint. The
- group doing it should try to find the next group, both through the
pga-process list and using directly personnal pressure.
(P) A long newspaper reporting on contents and projects coming out the decentralised gatherings has been edited during the conference and is available on the website. The first newsletter after the conference will be a compilation of articles and reports from the centralised gathering. There's an already existing working group.
Deadline : Send your reports by the 17th of September to stamp-journal(at)pgaconference.org
- the newsletter focus would be the activities of the network (conferences and pga process) + presentation of infopoints and activities of groups inspired by the pga network. The texts sent on pga-announce list would appear as well. It should be really clear that the newsletter doesn't reflect « what pga thinks ». It's a bit like a forum of discusion and of presentation of pga related groups.
- the newspaper should be no more than 16 pages
- all articles should be sent to the process list, so that people can react if they think that anything is really bad.
(P) riot.boogie(at)gmx.net from budapest said he would ask his group if they wanted to do the next newsletter. If another group already wants to take responsability for the
next one, it would be great.
3) Digital tools
(I) List-administration: organizing this PGA conference involved creating & using a series of mailing-lists, which were reviewed, some tagged for destruction, some for continuation and broader use:
- stamp-ds(at)pgaconference.org should allow participants to the “digital struggles” topic to communicate further; - pga-announce(at)pgaconference.org will hopefully be put to more use, as an announcement list on events & news related to the PGA network; - stamp-www(at)pgaconference.org will be used by the pgaconference.org webmasters to continue collaborative work on the websites; - stamp-i18n(at)pgaconference.org will be maintained as a resource for coordinating translations related to the PGA or associated groups; it took a while to setup such a thing, which is highly valuable to our activisms, but often lacking.
- PGA chat: an Internet Relay Chat channel was created on irc.indymedia.org for easing communication in between distant members of the STAMP collective. It has been put to extensive use during the “Digital Struggles” focus in the decentralized conference in Dijon, allowing interested parties to follow some of the discussions. There's no reason to get rid of it!
(I) Websites: the main PGA-related websites were collectively reviewed:
- http://pgaconference.org/ was initially created by Eurodusnie for the Leiden conference in 2002, but recently taken over & restarted from scratch by the STAMP collective. The following propositions were made:
- - keep pgaconference.org as a central website for informations about PGA encounters and their contents; - Links to other conferences will be put on pgaconference.org but it should be made clear that pgaconference.org still is a european project. - In the future it could be openning up to non-european PGA conferences: while the “pgaconference.org” is generic, all content is related to European conferences. From now on, the website will offer to host sections for non-european PGA conferences as well, which organizers of these events could fill-in themselves. This could turn pgaconference.org into a hosting platform for PGA conferences and meetings world-wide, helping convenors to self-manage their own section of the website. - this years's PGA conference organisation has made extensive use of digital tools; it will be documented, as to remember the lessons of this experiment, and allow others to benefit from it.
- linking with other projects coming out of this conference (the moving europe caravan, projects on squat.net & autonomous spaces database, autonomous server network created during the conference, etc.)
- http://stamp.poivron.org/ is a wiki (freely editable website), which worked alongside with the website. It worked as an online document folder, allowing the STAMP collective to share, edit & design texts easily. It has been proposed to move all STAMP/PGA06-related contents to a dedicated section, rename it to wiki.pgaconference.org and allow future PGA-conferences to use it.
- http://www.agp.org/ has been the official website for the PGA since years, and has grown big and quite complex, with translations in many languages. A few remarks were made, though time lacked to properly dive into the subject:
- readability: some mentionned the website lacked a coherent & visible structure, making it hard to find its way through it; - relation with pgaconference.org: it was suggested to move contents related to the PGA conferences to pgaconference.org, and to clarify which contents should go on either site, as to have a coherent communication infrastructure, with complementary websites; - contents: it was pointed out that agp.org contained some problematic materials that don't represent the PGA, since they express some very precise and particular political views. For instance, this can leed to the false impression that PGA is taking a precise stand in some of the most tense internal conflicts within radical movements, when a series of pages about the G8 summit in Genoa document the death of Carlo Giuliani in conspiracy theory fashion, and focus on the supposed police infiltration of the black bloc, which has fueled a lot of anti black bloc political stances since 2001. The proposal carried by the working group is to move these contents to personal websites, and to exclusively leave documents that have a direct relation to PGA supported campaigns & actions.
- - keep pgaconference.org as a central website for informations about PGA encounters and their contents; - Links to other conferences will be put on pgaconference.org but it should be made clear that pgaconference.org still is a european project. - In the future it could be openning up to non-european PGA conferences: while the “pgaconference.org” is generic, all content is related to European conferences. From now on, the website will offer to host sections for non-european PGA conferences as well, which organizers of these events could fill-in themselves. This could turn pgaconference.org into a hosting platform for PGA conferences and meetings world-wide, helping convenors to self-manage their own section of the website. - this years's PGA conference organisation has made extensive use of digital tools; it will be documented, as to remember the lessons of this experiment, and allow others to benefit from it.
(B) TOWARDS A NEW CONFERENCE
1) Continuity and Skill Sharing
(D) Continuation of the various thematic groups started during this conference: how to have more people taking part in the preparation of the issues for next PGA events and keeping issues working groups in between conference? Discussions about keeping or creating pga thematic lists that were created to organize this conference in between conference.
(I) It was proposed in belgrade to organize some PGA-process skill-sharing and to write a "PGA organization practical guide". (I) Stamp people have been starting to work on a tool-text/book about the way this conference was organized to pass knowledges (P) Need to try to keep usefull logistic contacts for the organization of next conferences and to ask already before the end of this one...
2) Organization of a PGA winter meeting
(D)(P) The idea would be to have a new winter/spring meeting after this conference for people involved with the various projects and structures and hopefully with a new convenor group. Are there any ideas and groups who would like to welcome and organize such meeting?
3) Finding a new convenor group for the next conference
(D) What would be the accurate process to find a new convenor during this conference or after? Are there already groups who think about organizing a next conference ?
(C)POSSIBLE CAMPAIGNS & ACTIONS
'''1)''' Actions and PGA network
(I) In order to inform what sort of campaigns and actions a peoples global action network could be necessary or useful for, the working group asks and proposes answers to the following questions:
A.) What are the objectives of the PGA network? The objective of the PGA is to support and further the hallmark principals (summary: reject destructive systems of domination and discrimination, use a confrontational attitude and direct action tactics, construct local alternatives to global capitalism, organise through decentralisation and autonomy.)
B.) In what ways can a PGA network be used to meet these objectives?
- Create concrete links between local and global struggles, furthering the awareness of global power structure behind local problems.
- Share experiences of autonomous spaces and exchange practical skills through working together on alternatives to capitalist and other destructive systems.
- Have an exchange about the effectiveness or relavency of past and present forms of action and reflect about which strategies to continue, abandon, change or invent.
C.) What are the capacities of the PGA that make it unique from other networks? What makes its additional existence necessary and helpful in meeting its objectives? The PGA is much broader than other existing networks as it is trans-national, trans-lingual, trans-thematical, and includes a diversity of action methods. In connecting these diverse groups the PGA has a capacity to facilitate a unique exchange of information and a unique scale of action coordination.
'''2)''' In argument for proposals
(D) Because PGA is not an association concrete support can only be meant in a practical sense and not in a theoretical.
It is the opinion of the working group that while it is good to share ideas and experiences, there are other adequate places to do this and so this does not justify the existence of the PGA if that is its only accomplishment. The working group felt that there was a relatively low ratio of action proposals compared to experience sharing this year and that the PGA is at risk of becoming an entity whose main accomplishment is reproducing itself rather than creating and continuing effective actions towards the change it desires in the world.
The working group concludes that the PGA is useful only as long as it births and informs projects that work towards its hallmarks, and suggests that this be a criteria by which to judge the necessity of its continued existence.
'''3)''' Proposals
(I) Therefore the working group proposes this process for convening on and then collecting proposals of action between the individuals of the network:
- Split up in smaller groups to brainstorm, what PGA could be useful for during the following year. What are its objectives if they have evolved, what are effective strategies given the current situations. Discuss what is the relevancy of PGA in supporting counter summits for example. Start a working process how this could be done concretely.
- Have much more proposals which can be brought back to larger groups, wherein some of the proposals can be chosen.
- Around the proposals action groups form by interested parties to help the proposals to become actions or campaigns.
(D) The working group used this process to brainstorm these following concrete proposals for action this year:
*Do thematical global action days before the G8 in Germany (migration, agrobusiness and education).
*Create alternatives to the capitalist system during the G8 in the region, which last longer than the G8 and involve the community.
*Support the no-border camp 2007 in the Ukraine and plan an action to shut down world wide financial districts.
(D) GLOBAL PROCESS
This working group addressed relationships with other continents, global solidarity, exchange campaigns, next global conference, link with the 6th declaration and proposal of new encuentro...
There is a perceived problem that globally the PGA is weak because it has lost its focus, we propose this methodology in order to find the answers
1) Relationship with other continents
We need to make a serious effort at outreach, this means both locally and globally both on and off the internet to establish/re-establish the connecting points of the PGA network (including the zapatistas).
We must revive our dialogue with allies in the South and find ways to make the PGA more relevant to specific struggles.
2) Global solidarity
(P) As part of the outreach effort, start a global Survey-Discussion to see what PGA is (or could be) to groups around the world; what resonates and what doesnt; Are there themes, or junctions of themes, that could connect groups better than just "anti-capitalist"? Which could give a new dynamic and action focus to PGA again? There is already a first list of persons who want to work on this (contact elviejo(at)greenmail.ch).
(I) Using Theme-based discussions and cross-overs to connect local, regional, global struggles. One proposal being discussed within the German G8 mobilization is using specific theme-days to connect the various global struggles to the G8 (G8 and agriculture for example)
3) Exchange campaigns
(P) Exchanges: As part of the process of our survey, we feel that there is need to seriously consider putting more effort into long term exchanges. This is especially important and proven effective in South-South relationships, and is an option taken at the last international meeting in Haridwar already being worked on in South Asian PGA.Interested persons should write to globalaction-subscribe(at)lists.riseup.net
(I) Resource Sharing: having the resources available to the network as was proposed within the decentralized gathering (legal guide; autonomous spaces database; sources of alternative technologies...) People can make suggestions for this to the webgroup stamp-www(at)pgaconference.org and/or the globalaction list. There is also a communication group. Contact them at agpcomm(at)lists.riseup.net. And a blog at deletetheborder.org/en/pga
4) next global conference
(I)We cannot propose another global conference now. First we must see some results of the process proposed and see also their pertinence for the South.
* Local, Regional, Continental Gatherings:
- We felt that the model of decentralized gatherings and more time was a positive thing
- it builds and strengthens network connections locally
- it allows themes to be discussed in depth
- it gives time/space for issues and campaigns to be developed. Taking this logic a step further, such regional conferences could be used as stepping stones toward a global conferences.
(D)Proposed concrete involvements for all groups:
- Participate in the proposed international discussion (which must also happen locally if it is to be a discussion between collectives! )
- Making new contacts, with a particular effort for Africa and Middle East. These can be announced and/or subscribed to the global action list.
- Specifically, make local and international contacts for the G8 theme days
- Translation help
- Propose ressources / knowhows
- Updating your infopoints in this process
(P)Particular job: - Constitute a global database of PGA organisations (volunteers?).
(E) ORIENTATION/POLITICAL DEFINITION OF A NETWORK (SUCH AS OURS)
This text is the result of a discussion in Fraysinnous
Noting an ongoing lack of involvement/enthusiasm in the PGA network as such, we tried to specify/explore what we could hope for from a European and global network (1). Redefining our motivation for having/being part of such a network seems to us a necessary precondition before people get involved in taking on work and responsibilities related to the network and the transformation of its structures. These questions might seem quite obvious to some people, but they aren't for everybody. Do we need to stick to them doggedly, to develop them and argue about them? In any case, they bear a direct relationship to questions of strategy at a global level.
Below is a proposal for a template/ templates/format for these type of meetings whether they are under the banner of PGA or not.(2)
1) In general, a network of this type could/should
At a global level
be an 'antidote' to the 'social forums' and other similar NGO and 'citizen stakeholder' initiatives, maintain a network of people who have things such as types of (direct) action and political standards (the hallmarks) in common, which allows us, without necessarily knowing people really well, to meet with other activists, in whom we can have already – a priori/ above anything else, a degree of trust and confidence, which we see as important.
provide a space for co-ordination on a global level.
From a strategic point of view
Co-ordination of struggles: finding ways to give our work a common direction; to identify the common crossover/ convergence points. Provide the means to express our respective needs to establish and develop ways of working together. Allow/facilitate us to bring our actions, methods of working (practices) and political discussions from our own groups (local, affinity) beyond individual (personal or group) positions, to a wider network (from the point of view of coordination of our struggles).
In order to facilitate common actions/action together- it is essential to create confidence and trust between us. For this to happen, we need to clarify what we don't agree on, and in a wider sense, develop the discussion on these points. This is an important precondition to good co-operation between us for an ongoing series of actions
Spice up some of our alternative practices to mix them up with the culture of direct action and proactive politics, and get them out of a culture of individualism in which they're often locked and isolated. Find new ways to engage and inform ordinary people, to get out of our isolated pockets of activism.
A need to broaden the range of things we work on
To pay some attention to the 'smaller' less discussed topics like home schooling, birth etc etc (in the sense of untangling ourselves from the control of the state) Create small working groups on these topics and to think of actions etc to continue work on them/ raising their profile..
2) Proposal for possible forms that these meetings could take, whether as part of PGA or not
Based on the impression from Fraysinnous that perhaps not enough people felt engaged by the PGA, we formulated a proposal for a meeting style/ template which corresponds more closely to the form of the meeting during this decentralized week. This proposal could potentially be taken as an idea that would replace the PGA purely and simply, if the 'defection' were confirmed on a European or global scale!. It could equally be seen as an complimentary and parallel initiative to a continuing PGA process, even as a project to be taken upby/worked on by future PGA meetings.
The principal idea is to preserve/ensure the quality of the meetings by limiting the set/number of themes (1) and their crossover convergence points(2) (as in Frayssinous, with "childhood" and "anti-industrialism")
1- Limiting/focusing themes: we can abandon the idea that every meeting concentrates all the topics together (being all things to all people?), to concentrate/focus ourselves around topics or networks and working groups which already exist (No Borders, Via Campesina, etc) and to work on creating others which don't exist yet, on the topics which are important to us (anti-industrialisme, childhood, etc). This orientation comes from the idea that this way of working and grouping together sets of themes suit the people involved better, is more condusive to the way they work on day to day basis between conferences and they will get more out of the meetings
2- Twinning themes: the idea is still based on preserving the great richness/diversity resulting from the convergence/nexus of these different strands of the struggle, by joining/mixing 2 or 3 topics/networks in same meetings. It would also be a question of preserving/ creating a format which would continue between meetings, to allow a sustainable rhythm of work that is less intense and full on ; calmer more constant, connected and complete